Whitney Warner, SPHR, JD, a former HR manager, now lives in
what she calls “enemy camp.” She means she’s a plaintiffs’ lawyer, and she
presented to an appreciative audience at a recent Society for Human Resource
Management conference many secrets from her side of the courtroom. She is a
partner in the New Mexico firm of Moody & Warner.
For a Limited Time receive a
FREE HR Report "Top 10 Best Practices in HR Management." This comprehensive special report will give you the information you need to know about these current HR challenges and how to most effectively manage them in your workplace.
Download Now
It’s not just about liability. Many employers believe that having a judge or jury rule against them
is the worst that can happen, but Warner says it’s not. The really expensive
part of a liability verdict is punitive damages for what the jury believes was
done to the plaintiff. Late in her talk she gave a compelling example of one
way to avoid such penalties. The plaintiff had been treated very badly: A
company client had come into the workplace, sexually assaulted the employee,
and then left. When she’d finished crying, she complained at length to HR. But
the company did nothing. And, sure enough, the client came back, this time
stalking the employee all through the building. Again she complained, again
nothing was done, and she sued, retaining Warner.
Warner related this tale: “I’m taking testimony from the
defendant’s witness, who promptly says, ‘We feel terrible that this happened.
[The plaintiff] was a valued employee, and we’re deeply saddened about her
experiences on our premises.’ Poof! There went our chances for any punitive
damages.” Warner noted further that many employer/defendants are afraid to
admit they made mistakes. Remember, she advises, your goal is not to be
vindicated (assuming something bad really did happen to the plaintiff), but to
reduce or avoid punitive damages.
Document, document, document. Turning to plaintiffs who sue for wrongful discharge, Warner
recommended sound practices for employers. “Forget at-will employment,” she
urged, “unless there’s an implicit contract, such as an employment agreement or
a handbook promise.” In other words, even in a thoroughly at-will employment
relationship, don’t refuse to tell any employee why he or she is being fired.
If it’s for poor performance, the employee should have received one or more
written warnings, and the evaluations conducted within a year or two of the
termination should clearly spell out that the individual needs to improve and
in what ways.
“All employees believe they’re either fully satisfactory or
stars. If you’re firing someone who’s so not a star that the person isn’t even
shiny, tell them the truth, over and over again.” An audience member asked,
“What if a fired employee wants you to give him the reason in writing?”
“Provide it, and be as specific as possible,” she responded.
“If it’s poor performance, give 4 or 5 examples. Saying the person violated
company policy is also good, and be cautious: Don’t say the person was fired
for sexual harassment—that’s a legal standard. Say instead that the
person violated your antiharassment policy. A document stating your legitimate
reasons for firing someone is useful to a plaintiff’s attorney, who may then turn
down the case.” Warner also warned that waiting until after someone sues to
give the reason makes it sound like you just made it up for the courtroom,
meaning your real reason might have been discriminatory.
Watch your timing. Managers and supervisors get angry, Warner acknowledges, when an employee even
lodges an internal complaint, much less sues. And, their first instinct is
often to fire the person. HR needs to get in the middle of every termination,
she advises, and ask, “Has this person complained about pay or work conditions
in the last 4 months?” If the answer is affirmative, hold off on the
termination, lest the person sue for retaliation.
The timing of an employer’s response to a complaint is also
crucial: Launch an investigation quickly and discipline a harasser as soon as
there’s corroboration of the misconduct. Suppose the person you want to head
the investigation is away for a month: Can you wait? “Absolutely not,” says
Warner. “Choose or hire someone else.” What if the complainant refuses to name
names? Interview all the people in the person’s department and those elsewhere
that often interact with him or her. “Ask each one if they’ve seen any behavior
that might embarrass or offend someone,” advises Warner.