For a Limited Time receive a
FREE HR Report "Top 10 Best Practices in HR Management." This comprehensive special report will give you the information you need to know about these current HR challenges and how to most effectively manage them in your workplace.
Download Now Human Resources practitioners need not rely on Employee Stock Ownership Programs
(ESOP) to create employee ownership. Nor must they rely solely on goal sharing
incentive programs to create ownership.
Many organizations experiment with programs offering advantages of both ESOPs
and goal sharing programs. One common aspect is the initial design process.
Several key strategic issues are addressed during program design:
- Short- and long-term results to be achieved.
- Employee efforts and behaviors needed to achieve these results.
- Eligible participants.
- How the program complements and supports current compensation philosophy
and strategy.
When creating an Employee Ownership Goal Share (EOGS) program, first define
the program objectives. Objectives clarify why the program exists and
what it should accomplish.
The ESOPs primarily provide an employee benefit directly related to the organization's
value expressed in stock value. Traditional goal sharing programs focus on improving
specific unit performance. The EOGS's objectives combine both. Eligible employees
see an increased benefit based on organization financial success. Goals also
focus on improving unit-based and organizationwide operational outcomes. Cash
rewards are treated like stock.
One organization developed a program with "Performance Award" certificates
issued annually. Exceeding annual margin targets funds the program. Allocation
of awards is based on meeting or exceeding specific unit-based targets. Three
levels of achievement are defined-minimal, target (expected), and optimum.
"Award" value is a percentage of incumbents' base pay. Minimal achievement
provides a 10 percent of base pay award. Target achievement provides 20
percent. Optimum achievement provides 30 percent.
A three-year "vesting" schedule is used. At award grant, certificates can be
redeemed for one-third of original value. In year two, an additional third can
be redeemed. In year three, the final third can be redeemed. Margin targets
must be met in subsequent years in order for that year's deferred payout to
occur. Employees can use the award's cash value to fund Section 125 spending
accounts.
All units and departments establish objectives utilizing the "balanced scorecard"
approach. The EOGS reinforces the improvement of department or unit outcomes
focusing on quality, customer, financial, and human resources improvements.
A specific goal related to each is established and given equal value.
Once primary circuit breaker funding targets are met, distribution is based
on achievement of balanced scorecard goals. Unit and department-based objectives
must be maintained at the threshold for the subsequent two years in order to
obtain the deferred payout. Each missed scorecard goal reduces the deferred
payment 20 percent.
This idea links employee actions closer to organizational strategic outcomes,
creating a sense of ownership. With ownership comes organizational acceptance
of employee involvement and empowerment.
Considering venturing into the world of employee partnership? Be prepared to
address the dilemma of building morale while slowing down the decisionmaking
process. An EOGS requires true employee involvement and empowerment, not just
the appearance of such.
Note
- This article is brought to you by Astron Solutions, providers of consulting
solutions for HR professionals. Visit their Web site at www.astronsolutions.com