For a Limited Time receive a
FREE HR Report "Top 10 Best Practices in HR Management." This comprehensive special report will give you the information you need to know about these current HR challenges and how to most effectively manage them in your workplace.
Download Now The California Supreme Court has heard oral arguments in a case that tests
the limits of sexual harassment protections when it comes to free speech in
the workplace (Lyle v. Warner Bros., California Supreme Court, No. S125171).
The lawsuit was filed in 2000 by a former writers' assistant, Amaani Lyle,
on the hit television show "Friends." She claimed that the writers'
room was a pit of crude talk and behavior, as the male writers engaged in frequent
sexually explicit and vulgar discussions.
As a result, Lyle filed a sexual harassment suit against the writers and Warner
Brothers, which produced the show. Lyle charged that the behavior created a
hostile work environment. Warner Bros., however, argued that the conduct in
the writers' room didn't violate the sexual harassment laws because
it was necessary to the creative process of developing episodes for the show
and amounted to protected speech. The company also contended that the conduct
wasn't severe or pervasive enough to amount to illegal harassment.
After a California appeals court in 2004 sided with Lyle, giving her the green
light to take her case to a jury, Warner Bros. appealed to the California Supreme
Court. The high court's decision in the case is expected in mid-May.