A St. Louis company paid its salespeople a base salary plus a
percentage of profits from their individual sales. Several salespeople sued the
company because they thought that the company was not properly paying them
their commissions. The trial court dismissed the case, finding that the
salespeople did not receive commissions at all and so could not sue for
penalties related to nonpayment of commissions.
For a Limited Time receive a
FREE HR Report "Top 10 Best Practices in HR Management." This comprehensive special report will give you the information you need to know about these current HR challenges and how to most effectively manage them in your workplace.
Download Now
What happened. National Dealers Warranty is a company in St. Louis that sells extended
automobile warranties over the telephone. It employs a number of salespeople to
perform this work. They are allowed to negotiate with customers, so prices for
warranties vary from sale to sale.
The employees were paid a base salary and then received
additional compensation based on “stated profits.” The stated profits were
calculated by determining the difference between a warranty’s retail price and
the final negotiated price arrived at by the salesperson and customer. The stated
profits would be higher if the salesperson managed to sell a warranty at
greater than retail price, and lower if the salesman sold it for less than
retail. National Dealers occasionally adjusted the method by which it
calculated stated profits, but the employees were always paid 10 percent of
those stated profits for the warranties they sold.
The employees who brought this class action lawsuit claimed
that National Dealers had violated state law—MO Rev. Stat. Sec.
407.911—which defines commissions and sets penalties for employers that
violate the law. The employees argued that National Dealers had unjustly
withheld an initial $1,000 from each salesperson’s commission and then failed
to pay them commissions due upon termination. National Dealers asked the trial
court to dismiss the case, which it did. The employees appealed.
What the court said. The question in this case was whether the employees’ compensation was actually
a “commission” as defined by Missouri law. The trial court held that it was
not.
Section 407.911 defines a commission as “compensation
accruing to a sales representative for payment by a principal, the rate of
which is expressed as a percentage of the dollar amount of orders or sales, or
as a specified amount per order or sale.” The employees argued that their
compensation arrangement qualified as a commission under both methods listed in
the statute. Because National Dealers had an explicit method of calculating
stated profits so that salespeople knew how much to expect as compensation from
any given sale, then their additional payment constituted a “specific amount
per sale.”
National Dealers countered that a specific method for
determining compensation was not the same as a specific amount of compensation.
They claimed that the statute only applies to cases in which a salesperson
receives a set dollar amount, such as $100 per sale. The Missouri Court of
Appeals agreed with this interpretation. In the statute, the word “specified”
modifies the word “amount,” which the court took to mean a specific dollar
amount or fixed sum per sale. The employees’ compensation varied based on
negotiated prices, so it was not a specified amount per order or sale.
The employees then argued that their compensation was a
percentage of the dollar amount of orders or sales. National Dealers countered
that their compensation was not a percentage of sales, but of profits. The
employer noted that the legislature could have included the word “profits” in
the statute but chose not to. The Court of Appeals observed that states vary in
their definitions of commissions; some include payments that are percentages of
profits and some do not. The court had to assume that the legislature
deliberately chose to exclude payments based on percentages of profits.
In that light, the only possible conclusion the court could
reach was that the employees were not paid commission under Missouri law. The
court affirmed the trial court’s dismissal of the case. Schwab v. National
Dealers Warranty, Inc., Missouri Court of
Appeals, Eastern District, No. ED92373 (9/8/09).
Point to remember: In
Missouri, paying a salesperson a percentage of sales is a commission; paying
him or her a percentage of profits is not.